热化学碘硫循环制氢流程设计与模拟

王明华,张东青,应芝

分布式能源 ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6) : 30-36.

PDF(1107 KB)
PDF(1107 KB)
分布式能源 ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6) : 30-36. DOI: 10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.2207604
学术研究

热化学碘硫循环制氢流程设计与模拟

作者信息 +

Flowsheet Design and Simulation of Thermochemical Iodine-Sulfur Cycle for Hydrogen Production

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在碳达峰、碳中和目标下,氢能是能源系统脱碳转型的重要载体,而热化学碘硫循环是实现大规模、高效、绿色制氢的技术之一。前期针对碘硫循环的流程设计中,Bunsen反应和HI分解反应均采用化学计量反应器,未考虑真实Bunsen反应动力学过程以及HI分解反应平衡转化率与温度的关联。基于此,该文设计产氢量100 m3/h的热化学碘硫循环制氢系统流程,建立Bunsen反应动力学自定义Fortran模块,采用吉布斯自由能最小化原则模拟HI分解反应,计算系统质量平衡和能量平衡,并完成灵敏度分析和热效率评估。研究结果表明:Bunsen反应进程在一定时间后基本达到平衡;H2SO4分解率的提升有利于降低整个系统能耗;提高分解温度对提升HI平衡分解率的作用不显著;考虑系统放热量的回收利用,获得系统的理想热效率可达57.4%。该研究可为大规模碘硫循环制氢系统优化与应用提供理论依据。

Abstract

Under the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, hydrogen energy is an important carrier for the decarbonization transformation of the energy system. Thermochemical iodine-sulfur cycle is one of the technologies to achieve large-scale, efficient and green hydrogen production. In the previous process design for iodide-sulfur cycle, stoichiometric reactors were employed for both Bunsen reaction and HI decomposition reaction, without considering the real Bunsen reaction kinetic process and the relationship between equilibrium conversion rate of HI decomposition reaction and temperature. In this paper, a thermochemical iodine-sulfur cycle for hydrogen production flowsheet with hydrogen production rate of 100 m3/h was developed. A user-defined Fortran module of Bunsen reaction kinetics was established, and HI decomposition reaction was calculated using Gibbs free energy minimization principle. The mass and energy balance of the system was calculated, and sensitivity analysis and thermal efficiency evaluation were conducted. Results show that the Bunsen reaction process basically reaches equilibrium after a certain time. The increase of H2SO4 decomposition rate is beneficial to reduce the overall energy consumption. The effect of increasing decomposition temperature on HI equilibrium decomposition rate is not significant. The ideal thermal efficiency of IS cycle reaches 57.4% considering the recycle of the heat released by the system. This study is expected to provide theoretical reference for the optimization and application of large-scale IS cycle for hydrogen production.

关键词

热化学制氢 / 碘硫循环 / Bunsen反应 / 流程模拟 / 热效率

Key words

thermochemical hydrogen production / iodine-sulfur cycle / Bunsen reaction / process simulation / thermal efficiency

引用本文

导出引用
王明华, 张东青, 应芝. 热化学碘硫循环制氢流程设计与模拟[J]. 分布式能源. 2022, 7(6): 30-36 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.2207604
Minghua WANG, Dongqing ZHANG, Zhi YING. Flowsheet Design and Simulation of Thermochemical Iodine-Sulfur Cycle for Hydrogen Production[J]. Distributed Energy Resources. 2022, 7(6): 30-36 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.2207604
中图分类号: TK22   

参考文献

[1]
MEHRPOOYA M, HABIBI R. A review on hydrogen production thermochemical water-splitting cycles[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 275: 123836.
[2]
ACAR C, DINCER I. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 218: 835-849.
[3]
刘建忠,陈聪,孙志昊,等. 燃煤电厂脱硫废水辅助煤电解制氢[J]. 发电技术2020, 41(5): 536-542.
LIU Jianzhong, CHEN Cong, SUN Zhihao, et al. Desulfurization wastewater-assisted coal electrolysis for hydrogen production in coal-fired power plants[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2020, 41(5): 536-542.
[4]
聂聪颖,沈小军,吕洪,等. 并网型风电场氢超混合储能容量配置及控制策略研究[J]. 智慧电力2020, 48(9): 1-8.
NIE Congying, SHEN Xiaojun, LYU Hong, et al. Capacity configuration and control strategy of hydrogen super hybrid energy storage in grid connected wind farm[J]. Smart Power, 2020, 48(9): 1-8.
[5]
王丹丹,李亚楼,李芳,等. 碳中和背景下高温固体氧化物电解制氢的过程建模与热力学分析[J]. 发电技术2021, 42(5): 554-560.
WANG Dandan, LI Yalou, LI Fang, et al. Process modelling and thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by high temperature solid oxide electrolysis under the background of carbon neutrality[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(5): 554-560.
[6]
卢一菲,陈 冲,梁立中. 基于电—氢混合储能的风氢耦合系统建模与控制[J]. 智慧电力2020, 48(3): 7-14.
LU Yifei, CHEN Chong, LIANG Lizhong. Modeling and control of wind-hydrogen coupling system based on electricity-hydrogen hybrid energy storage[J]. Smart Power, 2020, 48(3): 7-14.
[7]
李雪临,袁凌. 海上风电制氢技术发展现状与建议[J]. 发电技术2022, 43(2): 198-206.
LI Xuelin, YUAN Ling. Development status and suggestions of hydrogen production technology by offshore wind power[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(2): 198-206.
[8]
SAFARI F, DINCER I. A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 205: 112182.
[9]
NORMAN J H, MYSELS K J, SHARP R, et al. Studies of the sulfur-iodine thermochemical water-splitting cycle[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1982, 7: 545-556.
[10]
KASAHARA S, IWATSUKI J, TAKEGAMI H, et al. Current R&D status of thermochemical water splitting iodine-sulfur process in Japan Atomic Energy Agency[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 13477-13485.
[11]
ZHANG P, WANG L J, CHEN S Z, et al. Progress of nuclear hydrogen production through the iodine-sulfur process in China[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 1802-1812.
[12]
KIM H S, PARK H K, KIM Y H, et al. A convenient method for phase separation and composition determination of the Bunsen reaction products in sulfur-iodine hydrogen production process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 3955-3962.
[13]
LIBERATORE R, FAVUZZA P, FELICI C, et al. Materials resistance to corrosion by I2-HI-H2O mixtures for the realization of a sulfur-iodine plant[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 26816-26834.
[14]
ZHANG Y W, YANG H, ZHOU J H, et al. Catalytic decomposition of sulfuric acid over CuO/CeO2 in the sulfur-iodine cycle for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40: 2099-2106.
[15]
TAKEGAMI H, NOGUCHI H, TANAKA N, et al. Development of strength evaluation method of ceramic reactor for iodine-sulfur process and hydrogen production test in Japan Atomic Energy Agency[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2020, 360: 110498.
[16]
NOGUCHI H, TAKEGAMI H, KAMIJI Y, et al. R&D status of hydrogen production test using IS process test facility made of industrial structural material in JAEA[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 12583-12592.
[17]
HIROKI N, YU K, NOBUYUKI T, et al. Hydrogen production using thermochemical water-splitting iodine-sulfur process test facility made of industrial structural materials: Engineering solutions to prevent iodine precipitation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 22328-22343.
[18]
TANAKA N, TAKEGAMI H, NOGUCHI H, et al. Introduction of loop operating system to improve the stability of continuous hydrogen production for the thermochemical water-splitting iodine-sulfur process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 27891-27904.
[19]
ZHANG K, BAO W R, CHANG L P, et al. A review of recent researches on Bunsen reaction for hydrogen production via S-I water and H2S splitting cycles[J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2019, 33: 46-58.
[20]
NOMURA M, KASAHARA S, OKUDA H, et al. Evaluation of the IS process featuring membrane techniques by total thermal efficiency[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30: 1465-1473.
[21]
KASAHARA S, HWANG G J, NAKAJIMA H, et al. Effects of process parameters of the IS process on total thermal efficiency to produce hydrogen from water[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2003, 36: 887-899.
[22]
KASAHARA S, KUBO S, HINO R, et al. Flowsheet study of the thermochemical water-splitting iodine-sulfur process for effective hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32: 489-496.
[23]
LEE B J, NO H C, YOON H J, et al. An optimal operating window for the Bunsen process in the I-S thermochemical cycle[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 2200-2210.
[24]
LIBERATORE R, LANCHI M, GIACONIA A, et al. Energy and economic assessment of an industrial plant for the hydrogen production by water-splitting through the sulfur-iodine thermochemical cycle powered by concentrated solar energy[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 9550-9565.
[25]
WANG Q, LIU C, LI D, et al. Optimization and comparison of two improved very high temperature gas-cooled reactor-based hydrogen and electricity cogeneration systems using iodine-sulfur cycle[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 14777-14798.
[26]
ZHU Q Q, ZHANG Y W, YING Z, et al. Kinetic and thermodynamic studies of the Bunsen reaction in the sulfur-iodine thermochemical process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 8617-8624.
[27]
GUO H F, ZHANG P, BAI Y, et al. Continuous purification of H2SO4 and HI phases by packed column in IS process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 2836-2839.
[28]
PATHAK S, UPADHYAYULA S. A review on the development of supported non-noble metal catalysts for the endothermic high temperature sulfuric acid decomposition step in the iodine-sulfur cycle for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 14186-141210.
[29]
YING Z, WANG Y, ZHENG X, et al. Experimental study and development of an improved sulfur-iodine cycle integrated with HI electrolysis for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45: 13176-13188.
[30]
ZHANG Y W, ZHOU J H, WANG Z H, et al. Detailed kinetic modeling and sensitivity analysis of hydrogen iodide decomposition in sulfur-iodine cycle for hydrogen production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 627-632.

基金

国家能源集团科技项目(GJNY-22-154)

PDF(1107 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/