PDF(2044 KB)
PDF(2044 KB)
PDF(2044 KB)
综合能源灵活性评价指标体系与评估模型
Evaluation Index System and Evaluation Model of Comprehensive Energy Flexibility
随着综合能源系统复杂程度的增加,系统对部件耦合的要求也越来越高,这增加了系统的不确定性因素,因此,建立综合能源灵活性评价指标体系和评估模型是提高综合能源系统灵活性的关键前提。首先,分别从系统级和局部级来构建综合能源系统灵活性资源的指标评估体系;然后,综合考虑经济性、环保性、安全性等多方面因素,结合层次分析法、熵值法及模糊评价法搭建综合评估模型,并通过具体场景下的8种灵活性资源的调度方案进行指标权重的雷达图分析和模糊综合评价。结果表明:设置的灵活性资源调度方案中,灵活性得分最高的为燃气内燃机+燃气锅炉的调度方案;但是考虑到经济性、环保性、安全性等多个方面,燃气内燃机+热泵+水蓄能、燃气内燃机+热泵+储能电站这2个调度方案更为突出。
As the complexity of integrated energy systems increases, so does the demand for component coupling, leading to heightened system uncertainties. Hence, establishing an evaluation index system and assessment model for the flexibility of integrated energy is a crucial prerequisite for enhancing the flexibility of these systems. Initially, this paper constructs evaluation systems for integrated energy system flexibility resources at both the system-wide and localized levels. Then, integrating economic, environmental, and safety factors, this paper employs the analytic hierarchy process, the entropy method, and fuzzy evaluation to develop a comprehensive evaluation model. This model is used for radar chart analysis of index weights and fuzzy comprehensive evaluations based on scenarios implementing eight different flexibility resource scheduling schemes. Results indicates that among the set of flexibility resource scheduling schemes, the highest flexibility score is achieved by the scheme combining gas internal combustion and gas boilers. However, when considering multiple factors such as economic viability, environmental impact, and safety, the two scheduling schemes, gas internal combustion engine combined with heat pump and water energy storage, and gas internal combustion engine combined with heat pump and energy storage station, are more prominent.
综合能源系统 / 灵活性资源 / 评价指标 / 层次分析法 / 模糊评价法 / 综合评估模型
integrated energy system / flexible resources / evaluation index / analytic hierarchy process / fuzzy evaluation method / comprehensive evaluation model
| [1] |
鲁宗相,林弋莎,乔颖,等. 极高比例可再生能源电力系统的灵活性供需平衡[J]. 电力系统自动化,2022, 46(16): 3-16.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
王昊天,孙英云,汪丽伟,等. 基于联盟链的电动汽车虚拟聚合调频[J]. 电力系统自动化,2022, 46(16): 122-131.
|
| [5] |
胡嘉骅,文福拴,马莉,等. 电力系统运行灵活性与灵活调节产品[J]. 电力建设,2019, 40(4): 70-80.
|
| [6] |
陈建凯. 含分布式电源配电网灵活性优化提升方法[D]. 天津:天津大学,2020.
|
| [7] |
王守相,陈建凯,王洪坤,等. 综合考虑电动汽车充电与储能及可中断负荷调度的配电网两阶段灵活性提升优化方法[J]. 电力自动化设备,2020, 40(11): 1-10.
|
| [8] |
李强,邓卿,林鸿基,等. 计及灵活性的配电系统接纳电动汽车能力评估与提升策略[J]. 电力科学与技术学报,2019, 34(3): 37-46.
|
| [9] |
陈忠华,陈致远,王梦涵,等. 考虑电动汽车接入的配电网灵活性评估方法[J]. 现代电力,2022, 39(6): 702-709.
|
| [10] |
严欢,胡俊杰,黄旦莉,等. 考虑电动汽车虚拟电厂灵活性和高比例光伏接入的配电网规划[J]. 电力建设,2022, 43(11): 14-23.
|
| [11] |
周升彧,戴赛,许丹,等. 考虑源侧灵活性改造及可调节电热负荷的电热联合调度模型[J]. 电网技术,2020, 44(6): 2254-2262.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
胡俊杰,刘雪涛,王程. 考虑网络约束的能量枢纽灵活性价值评估[J]. 中国电机工程学报,2022, 42(5): 1799-1813.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
唐君毅,丁碧薇,杨琪. 考虑风电预测区间的电力系统灵活性评估方法[J]. 电气传动,2023, 53(7): 49-55.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |