基于博弈论的风光氢能源系统容量优化

陈鑫,王娟

分布式能源 ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 26-34.

PDF(7789 KB)
PDF(7789 KB)
分布式能源 ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 26-34. DOI: 10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.2409104
学术研究

基于博弈论的风光氢能源系统容量优化

作者信息 +

Capacity Optimization of Wind-Solar-Hydrogen Energy System Based on Game Theory

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目前风光氢能源系统中的能源利用率较低,传统的容量优化根据电解槽固定制氢效率进行建模且仅考虑了系统中存在1个运营商的情况,没有考虑到不同运营商之间的竞争与合作、电解槽工作时制氢效率的变化情况和待机启动成本,导致容量优化结果不理想。为解决上述问题,首先将有机朗肯循环与燃料电池相结合,用于回收余热;通过分析电解槽制氢效率的影响因素构建动态制氢效率数学模型,并引入二进制变量,用于描述电解槽的待机启动成本;采用基于博弈论的容量优化方法,以全年收益最大为目标采用麻雀搜索算法求解博弈的纳什均衡。仿真结果表明:添加余热利用后能源系统的总收益增加了4%;考虑动态制氢效率和待机启动成本后的质子交换膜电解槽容量减少了26.1%;氢储发电站的收益减少了55.3%;风光氢三方组成大联盟时联盟最稳定,且收益最大、容量配置最合理。

Abstract

Currently, the energy utilization rate of wind-solar-hydrogen energy system is low, and the traditional capacity optimization is modeled based on the fixed hydrogen production efficiency of the electrolyzer and only takes into account the existence of one operator in the system, without considering the competition and cooperation between different operators, the change of hydrogen production efficiency during the operation of the electrolyzer, and the standby start-up cost, which leads to unsatisfactory capacity optimization results. In order to solve the above problems, the organic Rankine cycle is firstly combined with the fuel cell for waste heat recovery; a mathematical model of dynamic hydrogen production efficiency is constructed by analyzing the influencing factors of hydrogen production efficiency of the electrolyzer, and binary variables are introduced for describing the standby startup cost of the electrolyzer; a capacity optimization method based on game theory is adopted, and the Nash equilibrium of the game is solved by using the sparrow search algorithm with the objective of maximizing the annual revenue. The simulation results show that: the total revenue of the energy system increases by 4% after adding waste heat utilization; the capacity of the proton exchange membrane electrolyzer after considering the dynamic hydrogen production efficiency and standby startup cost decreases by 26.1%; the revenue of the hydrogen storage power station decreases by 55.3%; and the coalition is the most stable with the largest revenue and the most reasonable capacity allocation when the three parties, namely, wind solar and hydrogen, form a grand coalition.

关键词

博弈论 / 容量优化 / 风光氢 / 余热利用 / 动态制氢效率

Key words

game theory / capacity optimization / wind-solar-hydrogen / waste heat utilization / dynamic efficiency of hydrogen production

引用本文

导出引用
陈鑫, 王娟. 基于博弈论的风光氢能源系统容量优化[J]. 分布式能源. 2024, 9(1): 26-34 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.2409104
Xin CHEN, Juan WANG. Capacity Optimization of Wind-Solar-Hydrogen Energy System Based on Game Theory[J]. Distributed Energy Resources. 2024, 9(1): 26-34 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.2409104
中图分类号: TK01; TM71   

参考文献

[1]
武强,涂坤,曾一凡. “双碳”目标愿景下我国能源战略形势若干问题思考[J]. 科学通报2023, 68(15): 1884-1898.
WU Qiang, TU Kun, ZENG Yifan. Research on China's energy strategic situation under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2023, 68(15): 1884-1898.
[2]
孙文文,何国庆. 基于能流图和碳流图的我国能源结构转型分析及展望[J]. 分布式能源2022, 7(4): 10-17.
SUN Wenwen, HE Guoqing. Analysis and prospect of China's energy structure transformation based on energy flow chart and carbon flow chart[J]. Distributed Energy, 2022, 7(4): 10-17.
[3]
朱静慧,高佳,余欣梅,等. 碳中和背景下我国生态碳汇发展形势及建议[J]. 内蒙古电力技术2022, 40(6): 1-8.
ZHU Jinghui, GAO Jia, YU Xinmei, et al. Developmengt situation and suggestions for ecological carbon sink in China under background of carbon neutralization[J]. Inner Mongolia Electric Power, 2022, 40(6): 1-8.
[4]
杨建宾,谢丽蓉,宋新甫,等. 基于可再生能源的碳捕集-电转气协同运行方法[J]. 智慧电力2022, 50(12): 70-78.
YANG Jianbin, XIE Lirong, SONG Xinfu, et al. Collaborative operation method of carbon capture-P2G based on renewable energy[J]. Smart Power, 2022, 50(12): 70-78.
[5]
黄树帮,陈耀,金宇清. 碳中和背景下多通道特征组合超短期风电功率预测[J]. 发电技术2021, 42(1): 60-68.
HUANG Shubang, CHEN Yao, JIN Yuqing. A multi-channel feature combination model for ultra-short-term wind power prediction under carbon neutral background[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2021, 42(1): 60-68.
[6]
TAN K M, BABU T S, RAMACHANDARAMURTHY V K, et al. Empowering smart grid: A comprehensive review of energy storage technology and application with renewable energy integration[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 39(102591): 1-22.
[7]
VITALE G. Hydrogen as a clean and sustainable energy vector for global transition from fossil-based to zero-carbon[J]. Clean Technologies, 2021, 3(4): 881-909.
[8]
希望·阿不都瓦依提,吕海鹏,晁勤. 基于非合作博弈的风-光-氢微电网容量优化配置[J]. 电力工程技术2022, 41(2): 110-118.
XIWANG Abuduwayiti, Haipeng, CHAO Qin. Optimal capacity configuration of wind-photovoltaic-hydrogenmicrogrid based on non-cooperative game theory[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2022, 41(2): 110-118.
[9]
韩莹,于三川,李荦一,等. 计及阶梯式碳交易的风光氢储微电网低碳经济配置方法[J]. 高电压技术2022, 48(7): 2523-2533.
HAN Ying, YU Sanchuan, LI Luoyi, et al. Low-carbon and economic configuration method for solar hydrogen storage microgrid including stepped carbon trading[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(7): 2523-2533.
[10]
XU C B, KE Y M, LI Y B, et al. Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-Ⅱ and CRITIC-TOPSIS[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 215: 1-18.
[11]
IZADI A, SHAHAFVE M, AHMADI P. Neural network genetic algorithm optimization of a transient hybrid renewable energy system with solar/wind and hydrogen storage system for zero energy buildings at various climate conditions[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 260: 1-16.
[12]
TEBIBEL H. Methodology for multi-objective optimization of wind turbine/battery/electrolyzer system for decentralized clean hydrogen production using an adapted power management strategy for low wind speed conditions[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 238: 1-23
[13]
LU Q, LU S, LENG Y. A Nash-Stackelberg game approach in regional energy market considering users' integrated demand response[J]. Energy, 2019, 175(5): 456-70.
[14]
CAI G W, KONG L G, XUE Y, et al. Overview of research on wind power coupled with hydrogen production technology[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2014, 38(21): 127-135.
[15]
ULLEBERG O. Modeling of advanced alkaline electrolyzers: A system simulation approach[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2003, 28(1): 21-33.
[16]
SAAD W, HAN Z, POOR H V, et al. Game-theoretic methods for the smart grid: An overview of microgrid systems, demand-side management, and smart grid communications[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2012, 29(5): 86-105.
[17]
WANG Haiyang, ZHANG Chenghui, LI Ke, et al. Game theory-based multi-agent capacity optimization for integrated energy systems with compressed air energy storage[J]. Energy, 2021, 221: 1-14.
[18]
ZHANG N, YAN Y, SU W. A game-theoretic economic operation of residential distribution system with high participation of distributed electricity prosumers[J]. Applied Energy, 2015, 154(9): 471-479.
[19]
WU Q, REN H, GAO W, et al. Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions[J]. Energy, 2017, 119(1): 384-391.
[20]
CHUANG A S, WU F, VARAIYA P. A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: Problem formulation and numerical comparisons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2001, 16(4): 885-891.
[21]
RAGHAV L P, KUMAR R S, RAJU D K, et al. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP): Swarm intelligence based flexible demand response management of grid-connected microgrid[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 306:1-16.

基金

陕西省重点产业链项目(2023-ZDLGY-24)
西安市清洁能源重点实验室专题项目(2019219914SYS014CG036)
先进金属与材料国家重点实验室开放基金项目(2022-Z01)
陕西省教育厅产业化项目(21JC018)
榆林市科技局项目(CXY-2022-171)

PDF(7789 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/