PDF(2266 KB)
PDF(2266 KB)
PDF(2266 KB)
基于电氢协同的新能源外送规划
Planning for the Delivery of New Energy Based on Electro-Hydrogen Synergy
随着新型电力系统建设的不断推进,西北地区新能源消纳能力不足与东部地区电力供应短缺的问题日益突出。因此,将西北地区富余的新能源电力输送至东部发达地区成为实现跨区域能源平衡的有效手段。针对远距离、大容量的新能源外送需求,提出了一种电氢协同的新能源外送方式。首先,构建了包含电能输送与氢能输送通道的新能源外送系统框架;其次,从新能源外送过程中的源端、传输端和负荷端出发,考虑设备的成本与损耗因素,并设置供需平衡、损耗、容量以及外送时间的约束条件,以最小化总成本和总损耗为优化目标,构建了电氢协同的新能源外送规划模型;最后,以甘肃地区4个新能源外送工程为例进行仿真分析。结果表明,采用电氢协同的外送规划方案使得系统总成本降低了5.72%~7.74%,验证了所提模型的有效性与合理性。
With the continuous advancement in the construction of new power systems, the issues related to insufficient new energy consumption capacity in Northwest China and electricity supply shortages in eastern regions have become increasingly prominent. Therefore, transporting surplus new energy from Northwest China to developed eastern regions has emerged as an effective means to achieve inter-regional energy balance. In response to the demand for long-distance and large-capacity new energy delivery, this paper proposes a collaborative approach utilizing both electricity and hydrogen for new energy transmission. First, we establish a framework for a new energy delivery system that encompasses both electric power transmission and hydrogen transport channels. Next, considering cost and loss factors associated with equipment at the source end, transmission end, and load end during the new energy delivery process, while imposing constraints on supply-demand balance, losses incurred during transportation capacity limits as well as delivery time, we formulate an optimization model aimed at minimizing total costs and losses within this collaborative planning context. Finally, we conduct simulation analyses using four cases from Gansu Province’s new energy delivery projects. The results indicate that implementing this collaborative planning scheme reduces overall system costs by approximately 5.72% to 7.74%, thereby validating the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed model.
电氢协同 / 新能源外送 / 电输送 / 氢输送 / 成本 / 损耗
electricity-hydrogen synergy / new energy delivery / electric transmission / hydrogen transport / cost / loss
| [1] |
马晓伟, 王文倬, 薛晨, 等. 西北新型电力系统先行示范体系探究[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2024, 40(1): 1-7.
|
| [2] |
周强, 马彦宏, 沈琛云, 等. 新时期中国西北地区新能源可持续发展反思与建议[J]. 电网与清洁能源, 2020, 36(6): 78-84.
|
| [3] |
安源, 郑申印, 苏瑞, 等. 风光水储多能互补发电系统双层优化研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(12): 510-517.
针对风电、光伏大规模并网造成的供电可靠性问题和弃风、弃光问题,结合抽水蓄能、储能电站以及电解水制氢的调节特性,提出一种风光水储多能互补系统双层优化调度策略。上层模型以系统全生命周期运行经济性最优为目标,旨在优化系统各单元的容量配置,保证供电可靠性和风光消纳水平;下层模型以系统每个调度周期内经济性最优为目标,旨在充分发挥储能的调峰能力,实现系统经济运行。该模型利用KKT条件和Big-M法将双层模型转换成单层线性规划问题,通过Matlab中调用CPLEX求解器进行求解,结果表明所提策略能有效提高系统供电可靠性和风光的消纳水平,验证了该模型的有效性。
In view of the power supply reliability problems caused by the large-scale grid connection of wind power and photovoltaic power, and wind and light abandonment problems, combined with the regulation characteristics of pumped storage, energy storage power plants and electrolytic water hydrogen production, a two-layer optimal dispatching strategy for wind water storage multi energy complementary system is proposed. The upper layer model aims to optimize the capacity configuration of each unit of the system to ensure the reliability of power supply and the level of wind and solar energy consumption, with the objective of optimizing the operating economy of the system throughout its life cycle; The lower level model aims to optimize the economy of the system in each dispatching cycle, and aims to give full play to the peak shaving output of energy storage to achieve economic operation of the system. The model uses KKT condition and Big-M method to transform the two-layer model into a single-layer linear programming problem, and calls CPLEX solver in Matlab to solve it. The results show that the proposed strategy can effectively improve the power supply reliability of the system and the absorption level of wind and solar energy, which verifies the effectiveness of the model.
|
| [4] |
贺海磊, 张彦涛, 孙骁强, 等. 考虑频率安全约束的西北电网新能源开发及直流外送规模评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(14): 4753-4762.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
Green hydrogen can help to decarbonize parts of the transportation sector, but its power sector interactions are not well understood so far. It may contribute to integrating variable renewable energy sources if production is sufficiently flexible in time. Using an open-source co-optimization model of the power sector and four options for supplying hydrogen at German filling stations, we find a trade-off between energy efficiency and temporal flexibility. For lower shares of renewables and hydrogen, more energy-efficient and less flexible small-scale on-site electrolysis is optimal. For higher shares of renewables and/or hydrogen, more flexible but less energy-efficient large-scale hydrogen supply chains gain importance, as they allow to temporally disentangle hydrogen production from demand via storage. Liquid hydrogen emerges as particularly beneficial, followed by liquid organic hydrogen carriers and gaseous hydrogen. Large-scale hydrogen supply chains can deliver substantial power sector benefits, mainly through reduced renewable curtailment. Energy modelers and system planners should consider the distinct flexibility characteristics of hydrogen supply chains in more detail when assessing the role of green hydrogen in future energy transition scenarios. We also propose two alternative cost and emission metrics which could be useful in future analyses.© 2021. The Author(s).
|
| [23] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |