PDF(1061 KB)
PDF(1061 KB)
PDF(1061 KB)
风光耦合双通道电解槽制氢系统的优化控制
Optimal Control of a Wind-PV Coupled Dual-Channel Electrolytic Cell Hydrogen Production System
为解决风光可再生能源出力波动性强导致电解制氢系统运行稳定性不足、单位制氢成本偏高的问题,针对风光耦合制氢应用场景,开展双通道混合制氢系统的优化控制方法研究。提出一种基于集合经验模态分解(ensemble empirical mode decomposition, EEMD)与Petri网启停修正的双通道电解槽优化控制策略,通过对风电与光伏功率信号进行EEMD分解,将不同频段功率分量分别分配至碱性与质子交换膜电解槽,并利用Petri网模型构建电解槽启停逻辑以抑制低负载频繁启停行为,同时建立以系统能量转换效率最大化和单位制氢成本最小化为目标的多目标优化模型,采用多目标粒子群优化算法进行求解。基于张北地区风光实测出力数据的仿真结果表明,优化后混合制氢系统的能量转换效率提升至58.64%,单位氢气生产成本降至
To address the poor operational stability and high unit hydrogen production cost caused by strong power fluctuations of wind and photovoltaic (PV) renewable energy, this study investigates an optimal control strategy for a dual-channel hybrid hydrogen production system under wind-PV coupled application scenarios. An optimal control strategy for a dual-channel electrolytic cell system based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and Petri net-based start-stop correction is proposed. Wind and PV power signals are decomposed using EEMD, and power components at different frequency bands are allocated to alkaline and proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolytic cells according to their dynamic response characteristics. Meanwhile, a Petri net model is employed to construct start-stop logic for electrolytic cells, effectively suppressing frequent switching under low-load conditions. Furthermore, a multi-objective optimization model is established with the objectives of maximizing system energy conversion efficiency and minimizing the unit hydrogen production cost, which is solved using a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Simulation results based on measured wind-PV power output data from the Zhangbei region indicate that the optimized hybrid hydrogen production system achieves an energy conversion efficiency of 58.64% and a unit hydrogen production cost of
风光互补 / 双通道电解槽 / 集合经验模态分解(EEMD) / Petri网 / 多目标优化 / 氢能系统控制
wind-photovoltaic (PV) complementarity / dual-channel electrolytic cells / ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) / Petri net / multi-objective optimization / hydrogen energy system control
| [1] |
王强, 党牛, 蒋子龙, 等. 碳中和背景下能源转型研究综述与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2025, 80(3): 586-604.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
唐文虎, 聂欣昊, 钱瞳, 等. 面向新型电力系统安全稳定的储能应用技术研究综述与展望[J]. 广东电力, 2024, 37(12): 3-15.
|
| [4] |
胡常胜, 摆志俊, 张章, 等. 计及静态电压稳定裕度的电制氢容量和布点规划研究[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(5): 91-101.
|
| [5] |
杨博, 张子健.. 基于人工智能的可再生能源电解水制氢关键技术及发展前景分析[J]. 发电技术, 2025, 46(3): 482-495.
YANG Bo, ZHANG Zijian. Analysis of key technologies and development prospects for renewable energy-powered water electrolysis for hydrogen production based on artificial intelligence[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(3): 482-495.
|
| [6] |
鲁亚楠, 徐涛, 刘泽楠.. 制氢系统对双馈风机串补系统次同步振荡特性的影响[J]. 发电技术, 2025, 46(4): 715-726.
LU Yanan, XU Tao, LIU Zenan. Effect of hydrogen production system on sub-synchronous oscillation characteristics of doubly fed induction generator systems with series compensation[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2025, 46(4): 715-726.
|
| [7] |
LI J C, XIAO Y, LU S Q. . Optimal configuration of multi microgrid electric hydrogen hybrid energy storage capacity based on distributed robustness[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 76: 109762.
|
| [8] |
牛萌, 洪振鹏, 李蓓, 等. 考虑制氢效率提升的风电制氢系统优化控制策略[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(9): 366-376.
|
| [9] |
尹诗斌, 蒋文杰, 文欢. 碱性电解槽制氢技术的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 西华大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 44(1): 168-180.
|
| [10] |
陈新, 任李萍, 陈春迎, 等. 光伏驱动电解水制氢技术的研究进展与挑战[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2024, 30(12): 38-55.
|
| [11] |
李建林, 王大龙, 赵文鼎, 等. 计及动态氢价的光伏电解水制氢调度策略[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(2): 99-112.
|
| [12] |
周步祥, 蔡宇豪, 邱一苇, 等. 考虑电、氢、氨市场的可再生能源电制氢合成氨系统多主体合作运行策略[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(11): 50-64.
|
| [13] |
宋洁, 郜捷, 梁丹曦, 等. 质子交换膜电解制氢系统建模研究综述[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(2): 58-78.
|
| [14] |
董超, 冯康康, 娄清辉, 等. 碱性水电解制氢系统稳态建模研究[J]. 分布式能源, 2025, 10(5): 21-29.
|
| [15] |
杨玉, 娄清辉, 石祥建, 等. 离网型新能源混联制氢协同控制策略研究[J]. 分布式能源, 2025, 10(4): 73-80.
|
| [16] |
SAKAS G, IBÁÑEZ-RIOJA A, RUUSKANEN V, et al.. Dynamic energy and mass balance model for an industrial alkaline water electrolyzer plant process[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(7): 4328-4345.
|
| [17] |
AGUIRRE O A, OCAMPO-MARTINEZ C, CAMACHO O. . Control strategies for alkaline water electrolyzers: A survey[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 86: 1195-1213.
|
| [18] |
何平, 雷勇, 杜佳耘, 等. 基于EWT-FC方法的氢-超级电容混合储能功率分配[J]. 电源学报, 2023, 21(5): 191-199.
|
| [19] |
王振浩, 王翀, 成龙, 等. 基于集合经验模态分解和深度学习的光伏功率组合预测[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(10): 4133-4142.
WANG Zhenhao, WANG Chong, CHENG Long, et al. Photovoltaic power combined prediction based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and deep learning[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(10): 4133-4142.
|
| [20] |
郑博, 白章, 袁宇, 等. 多类型电解协同的风光互补制氢系统与容量优化[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(23): 8486-8495.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
ABDIN Z, WEBB C J, GRAY E M.. Modelling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(39): 13243-13257.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |