基于改进灰色神经网络的电力系统碳排放峰值预测方法

罗文东, 史松宝, 陈铮, 万宏, 张翼航, 徐恒辉

分布式能源 ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 83-90.

PDF(655 KB)
PDF(655 KB)
分布式能源 ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 83-90. DOI: 10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.25100183
智能配电与微网

基于改进灰色神经网络的电力系统碳排放峰值预测方法

作者信息 +

Prediction Method for Peak Carbon Emissions in Power Systems Based on Improved Grey Neural Network

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对电力系统碳排放峰值预测中数据质量低、模型超参数耦合度高及峰值定位误差大等现实问题,提出了一种融合鲁棒数据预处理与改进灰色-卷积混合模型的预测框架。首先,建立基于动态分位数边界的离群值检测与多窗口加权鲁棒修复流程,并引入基于随机森林特征重要性的链式多重插值法,以解决非高斯分布数据中的离群干扰和高维缺失问题;在此基础上,构建融合变分模态分解、空洞卷积与注意力门控的改进卷积网络,嵌入改进灰色模型提取长期趋势,并通过灰色关联度引导的鲸鱼优化算法完成超参数寻优。实验结果表明:与遗传算法、粒子群优化及灰狼优化算法相比,所提算法将平均绝对百分比误差分别降低39.7%、32.5%、25.4%,峰值预测时刻偏差分别降低77.1%、71.4%、60.0%;与自回归整合移动平均(autoregressive integrated moving average, ARIMA)、长短期记忆网络-先知混合模型(long short-term memory-prophet, LSTM-Prophet)、时序变换器(time-series transformer,TST)、经验模态分解-长短期记忆网络(empirical mode decomposition - LSTM,EMDE-LSTM)、变分模态分解-门控循环单元(variational mode decomposition-gated recurrent unit, VMD-GRU)相比,所提模型将平均绝对百分比误差降至2.89%,峰值预测时刻偏差降至0.7 h,拐点捕捉率提升至93.8%。该研究为碳排放峰值精准预测提供了新的技术路径,并为电力系统减排策略制定提供了数据支持。

Abstract

To address the practical challenges of poor data quality, strong hyperparameter coupling, and significant peak positioning errors in power system carbon emission peak forecasting, a framework integrating robust data preprocessing with an improved grey-convolution hybrid model is proposed. Firstly, a dynamic quantile boundary-based outlier detection and multi-window weighted robust repair procedure is established, together with a random forest feature importance-based chained multiple imputation method, to suppress outlier disturbances and high-dimensional missingness in non-Gaussian data. Subsequently, an improved convolutional network incorporating variational mode decomposition, dilated convolution, and attention gating is constructed, with an embedded improved grey model for long-term trend extraction; hyperparameter optimization is achieved through a grey relational grade-guided whale optimization algorithm. Experimental results show that compared with genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and grey wolf optimization, the proposed algorithm reduces mean absolute percentage error by 39.7%, 32.5%, and 25.4%, and peak prediction time deviation by 77.1%, 71.4%, and 60.0%, respectively. Compared with autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), long short-term memory - prophet (LSTM-Prophet), time-series transformer (TST), empirical mode decomposition-LSTM (EMDE-LSTM), and variational mode decomposition - gated recurrent unit (VMD-GRU), the proposed model reduces mean absolute percentage error to 2.89% and peak prediction time deviation to 0.7 h, while improving the inflection point capture rate to 93.8%. This study provides a new technical approach for accurate carbon emission peak prediction and offers data support for power system emission reduction strategy formulation.

关键词

电力系统碳排放预测 / 峰值识别 / 改进灰色-卷积混合模型 / 动态分位数边界 / 链式多重插值 / 灰色关联度引导的鲸鱼优化算法

Key words

power system carbon-emission forecasting / peak identification / improved grey-convolution hybrid model / dynamic quantile boundary / chained multiple imputation / grey relational grade-guided whale optimization algorithm

引用本文

导出引用
罗文东, 史松宝, 陈铮, . 基于改进灰色神经网络的电力系统碳排放峰值预测方法[J]. 分布式能源, 2026, 11(3): 83-90 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.25100183.
LUO Wendong, SHI Songbao, CHEN Zheng, et al. Prediction Method for Peak Carbon Emissions in Power Systems Based on Improved Grey Neural Network[J]. Distributed Energy, 2026, 11(3): 83-90 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.25100183.
中图分类号: TK 01;TM 71   

参考文献

[1]
胡胜, 王振华, 邢汉发, 等. 中国城市路网形态与交通碳排放关系及影响机制研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2025, 27(7): 1687-1703.
HU Sheng, WANG Zhenhua, XING Hanfa, et al. Relationship and impact mechanisms between urban road-network form and transport carbon emissions in China[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2025, 27(7): 1687-1703.
[2]
吴强, 陈金兰. 农业机械化对农业碳排放的影响及其空间溢出效应[J]. 统计与决策, 2025, 41(12): 60-65.
WU Qiang, CHEN Jinlan. Impact of agricultural mechanization on agricultural carbon emissions and its spatial spillover effects[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2025, 41(12): 60-65.
[3]
徐鑫, 单皖粤, 张峥, 等. 钢铁行业大气污染物排放清单、CO2排放清单的研究现状与未来展望[J]. 工程科学学报, 2025, 47(6): 1360-1376.
XU Xin, SHAN Wanyue, ZHANG Zheng, et al. Current research and future prospects of air pollutant and CO2 emission inventories in the iron and steel industry[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2025, 47(6): 1360-1376.
[4]
杨晓, 姚明宇, 韩伟, 等. 大规模可再生能源电解制氢技术现状及发展研究[J]. 热力发电, 2025, 54(5): 33-43.
YANG Xiao, YAO Mingyu, HAN Wei, et al. Review on current status and development of large-scale renewable energy electrolysis hydrogen production technology[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2025, 54(5): 33-43.
[5]
步天龙, 寇汉鹏, 张大沛, 等. 考虑风光发展趋势与碳排放评估的多能源系统优化运行模型[J]. 可再生能源, 2025, 43(2): 260-267.
BU Tianlong, KOU Hanpeng, ZHANG Dapei, et al. Optimization operation model of multi-energy system considering wind power and PV development trend and carbon emission assessment[J]. Renewable Energy Resources, 2025, 43(2): 260-267.
[6]
宋美琪, 李洪全, 武浩, 等. 考虑碳排放优化的多层随机模型预测的配电网新能源电压控制方法[J]. 供用电, 2025, 42(1): 72-78.
SONG Meiqi, LI Hongquan, WU Hao, et al. Renewable voltage control method for distribution networks based on multi-layer stochastic model prediction[J]. Distribution & Utilization, 2025, 42(1): 72-78.
[7]
刘清, 聂凤铭, 王磊. 内河船舶营运碳排放强度预测方法研究[J]. 中国航海, 2025, 48(2): 127-135.
LIU Qing, NIE Fengming, WANG Lei. Research on prediction method of carbon emission intensity for inland waterway vessel operations[J]. Navigation of China, 2025, 48(2): 127-135.
[8]
魏静, 刘芙冉, 袁婷, 等. 基于VAR和ARIMA-LSTM模型的碳排放权交易价格影响因素分析及预测[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 43(2): 280-289.
WEI Jing, LIU Furan, YUAN Ting, et al. Analysis and prediction of influencing factors of carbon emission trading price based on VAR and ARIMA-LSTM model[J]. Journal of Hubei Minzu University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 43(2): 280-289.
[9]
袁海山, 叶昀, 张东杰, 等. 基于TCN-LSTM-Attention的园区建筑供暖碳排放预测[J]. 建筑科学, 2025, 41(6): 93-101.
YUAN Haishan, YE Yun, ZHANG Dongjie, et al. Prediction of carbon emissions from heating in park buildings based on TCN-LSTM-Attention[J]. Building Science, 2025, 41(6): 93-101.
[10]
王庆荣, 王俊杰, 朱昌锋, 等. 基于SD-ISSA-DALSTM的交通运输业碳排放预测[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(5): 66-81.
WANG Qingrong, WANG Junjie, ZHU Changfeng, et al. Carbon emission prediction in transportation industry based on SD-ISSA-DALSTM[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 53(5): 66-81.
[11]
于晓月, 潘昊, 王国刚. 基于改进的LSTM电力碳排放分解预测模型[J]. 电子设计工程, 2024, 32(23): 12-16.
YU Xiaoyue, PAN Hao, WANG Guogang. Decomposition prediction model for electricity carbon emission based on improved LSTM[J]. Electronic Design Engineering, 2024, 32(23): 12-16.
[12]
闫庆友, 党嘉璐, 林宏宇, 等. 考虑全生命周期碳排放的电氢耦合VPP调度优化[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(4): 13-25.
YAN Qingyou, DANG Jialu, LIN Hongyu, et al. The scheduling optimization model for electric-hydrogen coupled VPP considering life-cycle carbon emissions[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(4): 13-25.
[13]
张妍, 冷媛, 尚楠, 等. 考虑碳排放需求响应及碳交易的电力系统双层优化调度[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(5): 94-104.
ZHANG Yan, LENG Yuan, SHANG Nan, et al. Bi-level optimal scheduling of power system considering carbon demand response and carbon trading[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(5): 94-104.
[14]
解婷婷, 孙友源, 郭振, 等. 火电机组碳排放连续监测技术研究与应用综述[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45(5): 919-928.
XIE Tingting, SUN Youyuan, GUO Zhen, et al. Summary of research and application of continuous monitoring technology for carbon emissions from thermal power units[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(5): 919-928.
[15]
袁家海, 胡玥琳, 张健. 基于改进三阶段松弛测量-数据包络模型的火电上市公司碳排放效率评估研究[J]. 发电技术, 2024, 45(3): 458-467.
YUAN Jiahai, HU Yuelin, ZHANG Jian. The carbon emission efficiency of China’s listed thermal power companies: An improved three-stage slack based measure-data envelopment analysis model[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2024, 45(3): 458-467.
[16]
李楠, 刘佳佳, 赖心怡, 等. 基于时间序列神经分层插值模型的光伏功率超短期多步预测[J]. 智慧电力, 2024, 52(4): 69-77.
LI Nan, LIU Jiajia, LAI Xinyi, et al. Ultra-short-term multi-step forecasting of photovoltaic power based on time series neural hierarchical interpolation model[J]. Smart Power, 2024, 52(4): 69-77.
[17]
周生存, 罗毅, 易煊承, 等. 考虑数据缺失的图注意力网络暂态稳定评估[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57(5): 157-167.
ZHOU Shengcun, LUO Yi, YI Xuancheng, et al. Transient stability assessment of graph attention networks considering data missing[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57(5): 157-167.
[18]
魏新迟, 董佳, 时珊珊, 等. 基于云模型和随机森林的韧性城市电网风险预警模型[J]. 电力建设, 2024, 45(5): 19-28.
WEI Xinchi, DONG Jia, SHI Shanshan, et al. Enhanced risk warning model for resilient urban power grid using cloud model and random forest[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2024, 45(5): 19-28.
[19]
陈晓华, 吴杰康, 龙泳丞, 等. 基于核主成分分析和食肉植物算法优化随机森林的风电功率短期预测[J]. 山东电力技术, 2024, 51(1): 59-67.
CHEN Xiaohua, WU Jiekang, LONG Yongcheng, et al. Short-term wind power prediction based on random forest optimized by kernel principal component analysis and carnivorous plant algorithm[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2024, 51(1): 59-67.
[20]
邹鑫, 罗涓. 用梯度提升决策树实现电力负荷非线性影响因素分析[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2024, 40(3): 10-19.
ZOU Xin, LUO Juan. The analysis of nonlinear influence factors of electric power load realized by gradient lifting decision tree[J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2024, 40(3): 10-19.
[21]
俞胜, 孙可, 蔡华, 等. 结合极端梯度提升决策树与改进Informer的短期电力负荷预测方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(10): 195-205.
YU Sheng, SUN Ke, CAI Hua, et al. A short-term power load forecasting method combining extreme gradient boosting decision tree with an improved Informer[J]. Electric Power, 2025, 58(10): 195-205.
[22]
王健, 焦洋, 张蕾, 等. 不同计量方法对燃气机组碳排放监测的影响分析[J]. 分布式能源, 2025, 10(2): 81-89.
WANG Jian, JIAO Yang, ZHANG Lei, et al. Analysis of the influence of different measurement methods on carbon emission monitoring of gas-fired units[J]. Distributed Energy, 2025, 10(2): 81-89.
[23]
王鹏, 胡梦媛, 贾佳乐, 等. 基于变分模态分解与深度学习的风电功率预测[J]. 分布式能源, 2025, 10(4): 44-51.
WANG Peng, HU Mengyuan, JIA Jiale, et al. Wind power prediction based on variational mode decomposition and deep learning[J]. Distributed Energy, 2025, 10(4): 44-51.
[24]
邱书琦, 蹇照民, 方立雄, 等. 基于变分模态分解和集成学习的光伏发电预测[J]. 智慧电力, 2024, 52(3): 32-38.
QIU Shuqi, JIAN Zhaomin, FANG Lixiong, et al. Photovoltaic power generation forecasting based on variational modal decomposition and ensemble learning[J]. Smart Power, 2024, 52(3): 32-38.
[25]
孙晓军, 宋恩哲, 姚崇, 等. 基于自适应扰动鲸鱼优化算法的混合动力能量管理策略研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2024, 45(10): 1991-2000.
SUN Xiaojun, SONG Enzhe, YAO Chong, et al. Energy management strategy of hybrid power based on adaptive perturbation whale optimization algorithms[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2024, 45(10): 1991-2000.

版权

版权所有©2026《分布式能源》编辑部
PDF(655 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/