Research on Tail Risk Spillover Effect of Carbon Market and New Energy Market

Xiping WANG, Ping YU

Distributed Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 23-31.

PDF(1843 KB)
PDF(1843 KB)
Distributed Energy ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 23-31. DOI: 10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.(2025)010-01-0023-09
Basic Research

Research on Tail Risk Spillover Effect of Carbon Market and New Energy Market

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Exploring the risk spillovers of carbon market and new energy market is of great significance for preventing market risks and maintaining the healthy and stable operation of carbon markets and new energy markets. Tail-event driven network model is used to construct the carbon-new energy system, and the tail risk spilover effect of carbon market and new energy market is analyzed from different perspectives such as system, market and individual. The results show that the overall correlation between carbon and new energy system has obvious cyclical characteristics, and the sudden extreme events will increase the risk correlation degree. During the sample period, the risks absorbed by the carbon market from the new energy market are greater than those transmitted to the new energy market, and the carbon market and the photovoltaic sub-market are more closely related. With the improvement of carbon market and new energy market, the number of associated edges in the window period of local extreme point gradually increases, and the network structure becomes more and more complex. When the overall correlation degree is at the local maximum, the carbon market and photovoltaic sub-market mainly play the role of risk spillover channel, and the wind power and new energy vehicle sub-market have the function of spillover and bidirectional spillover. Finally, suggestions are put forward from the perspectives of risk prevention and control, market construction and supervision and management.

Key words

carbon market / new energy market / tail risk spillover effect / tail-event driven network

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xiping WANG , Ping YU. Research on Tail Risk Spillover Effect of Carbon Market and New Energy Market[J]. Distributed Energy Resources. 2025, 10(1): 23-31 https://doi.org/10.16513/j.2096-2185.DE.(2025)010-01-0023-09

References

[1]
白强, 董洁, 田园春. 中国碳排放权交易价格的波动特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(5): 161-165.
BAI Qiang, DONG Jie, TIAN Yuanchun. Study on the fluctuation characteristics and influencing factors of carbon emission trading price in China[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2022, 38(5): 161-165.
[2]
俞越, 李雪雯. 我国碳交易市场碳价影响因素分析[J]. 金融纵横, 2021(11): 14-20.
YU Yue, LI Xuewen. Influencing factors of carbon price in China’s carbon trading markets[J]. Financial Perspectives Journal, 2021(11): 14-20.
[3]
ZHAO X, HAN M, DING L, et al. Usefulness of economic and energy data at different frequencies for carbon price forecasting in the EU ETS[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 216: 132-141.
[4]
王喜平, 王恬恬. 碳价与电力公司股价间风险溢出效应及影响因素研究[J]. 分布式能源, 2023, 8(5): 44-53.
WANG Xiping, WANG Tiantian. Risk spillover effect and influencing factors between carbon price and share price of power companies[J]. Distributed Energy, 2023, 8(5): 44-53.
[5]
YAHŞI M, ÇANAKOĞLU E, AĞRALı S. Carbon price forecasting models based on big data analytics[J]. Carbon Management, 2019, 10(2): 175-187.
After the establishment of the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) carbon pricing attracted many researchers. This paper aims to develop a prediction model that anticipates future carbon prices given a real-world data set. We treat the carbon pricing issue as part of big data analytics to achieve this goal. We apply three fundamental methodologies to characterize the carbon price. First method is the artificial neural network, which mimics the principle of human brain to process relevant data. As a second approach, we apply the decision tree algorithm. This algorithm is structured through making multiple binary decisions, and it is mostly used for classification. We employ two different decision tree algorithms, namely traditional and conditional, to determine the type of decision tree that gives better results in terms of prediction. Finally, we exploit the random forest, which is a more complex algorithm compared to the decision tree. Similar to the decision tree, we test both traditional and conditional random forest algorithms to analyze their performances. We use Brent crude futures, coal, electricity and natural gas prices, and DAX and S&P Clean Energy Index as explanatory variables. We analyze the variables' effects on carbon price forecasting. According to our results, S&P Clean Energy Index is the most influential variable in explaining the changes in carbon price, followed by DAX Index and coal price. Moreover, we conclude that the traditional random forest is the best algorithm based on all indicators. We provide the details of these methods and their comparisons.
[6]
刘建和, 温从乐, 梁佳丽. 贸易战背景下碳市场与能源市场溢出效应研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2021, 40(7): 57-64.
Abstract
2018年中美贸易战的爆发,对中美碳市场和能源市场都造成了强烈的冲击。为探究中美贸易战对中国碳市场的影响,本文利用断点回归模型发现碳市场价格在中美贸易战爆发前后出现了断层现象。本文运用VAR和方差分解来找出贸易战前后对碳市场影响最大的传统能源市场。通过DCC-GARCH模型,本文研究了中国碳市场与能源市场在中美贸易战前后的溢出关系变化,并发现不同市场间的动态相关性发生了变化。本文以中美贸易战为背景,探究贸易战对中国碳市场和传统能源市场的冲击和影响,无论是从碳风险管理还是从缓解气候恶化角度都具有重要的现实意义。 
LIU Jianhe, WEN Congle, LIANG Jiali. Research on spillover effects of carbon market and energy market under the background of trade war[J]. Journal of Industrial Techno-logical Economics, 2021, 40(7): 57-64.
[7]
ADAMS S, ACHEAMPONG A O. Reducing carbon emissions: The role of renewable energy and democracy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 240: 118245.
[8]
齐绍洲, 张振源. 碳金融对可再生能源技术创新的异质性影响: 基于欧盟碳市场的实证研究[J]. 国际金融研究, 2019(5): 13-23.
Abstract
本文构建了新凯恩斯主义DSGE模型,通过在货币政策规则中引入已预期的政策冲击来刻画前瞻性指引,然后利用美国数据分两步对模型参数进行贝叶斯估计,通过方差分解和脉冲响应分析,考察前瞻性指引的效果。结果表明,2008年第四季度至2018年第一季度,前瞻性指引能够解释产出、消费、投资、劳动和利率15%~45%的波动。当经济处于正常时期,前瞻性指引能够通过引导公众通胀预期,改变其当期的消费和投资决策,进而对当期的经济产出产生影响。同时,价格粘性程度和泰勒规则中通胀缺口与产出缺口的反应系数会影响前瞻性指引的效果。当经济处于衰退时期,零利率下限约束导致常规货币政策失效,前瞻性指引既可以降低经济衰退的程度,也可以推动经济复苏。
QI Shaozhou, ZHANG Zhenyuan. Research on the hetero-geneity influence of carbon finance on renewable technology innovation: Evidences from EU ETS[J]. Studies of Inter-national Finance, 2019(5): 13-23.
[9]
李洪超, 聂顺江. 国际原油市场与我国绿债市场、碳市场和低碳股票市场的联动效应研究[J]. 开发性金融研究, 2023(4): 20-34.
LI Hongchao, NIE Shunjiang. Research on the linkage effect between the international crude oil market and China’s green bond market, carbon market, and low carbon stock market[J]. Development Finance Research, 2023(4): 20-34.
[10]
王许, 乔清薇, 陈霄. 碳排放权交易市场与新能源市场的动态相依关系研究: 以我国碳市场试点为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(6): 89-106.
WANG Xu, QIAO Qingwei, CHEN Xiao. Study on the dynamic dependence between carbon emission trading market and new energy market: A case study of China’s carbon market pilot[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology (Social Sciences), 2021, 23(6): 89-106.
[11]
ROSS S A. Information and volatility: The No-arbitrage martingale approach to timing and resolution irrelevancy[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1989, 44(1): 1.
[12]
赵一航, 赵会茹. 我国碳市场与化石能源市场溢出效应研究: 基于VAR-GARCH-BEKK模型的分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2024, 43(4): 36-45.
ZHAO Yihang, ZHAO Huiru. Research on the spillover effects between China’s carbon market and fossil energy market: Analysis based on VAR-GARCH-BEKK model[J]. Journal of Industrial Technology and Economy, 2024, 43(4): 36-45.
[13]
吴永, 张静, 龚乃林, 等. R-vine copula在中国碳市场中的风险溢出效应研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 36(1): 285-293.
WU Yong, ZHANG Jing, GONG Nailin, et al. Rsearch on the risk spillover effect of R-vine copula in China’s carbon markets[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2022, 36(1): 285-293.
[14]
张洪伟, 田洪志, 杜佳玥. 碳市场与煤炭市场溢出效应机制的时变分析[J]. 经济纵横, 2023(12): 113-123.
ZHANG Hongwei, TIAN Hongzhi, DU Jiayue. Temporal variations of carbon market and coal market spillover mechanism[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2023(12): 113-123.
[15]
WU R, QIN Z. Assessing the extreme risk spillovers to carbon markets from energy markets: Evidence from China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(13): 37894-37911.
[16]
WU X, JIANG Z. Time-varying asymmetric volatility spillovers among China’s carbon markets, new energy market and stock market under the shocks of major events[J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 126: 107004.
[17]
郭娜, 王珮瑶, 刘精山, 等. 中国碳市场与新能源股票市场的极端风险溢出效应——基于尾部相依性和非对称性视角的分析[J/OL]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024,1-11[2024-08-12]. https://doi.org/10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202402.0264.
GUO Na, WANG Peiyao, LIU Jingshan, et al. Extreme risk spillover effects of China’s carbon market and new energy stock market: An analysis based on tail dependence and asymmetry perspectives[J/OL]. Journal of Hainan University (Huma-nities and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 1-11[2024-08-12]. https://doi.org/10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202402.0264.
[18]
王喜平, 于萍. 基于非对称性的碳市场与新能源市场间动态风险溢出效应研究[J]. 电力科学与工程, 2024, 40(7): 26-33.
WANG Xiping, YU Ping. Research on dynamic risk spillover effects between carbon market and new energy market based on asymmetry[J]. Electric Power Science and Engineering, 2024, 40(7): 26-33.
[19]
BILLIO M, GETMANSKY M, LO A W, et al. Econo-metric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors[J]. Journal of Financial Eco-nomics, 2012, 104(3): 535-559.
[20]
DIEBOLD F X, YıLMAZ K. On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2014, 182(1): 119-134.
[21]
HÄRDLE W K, WANG W, YU L. TENET: Tail-Event driven network risk[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2016, 192(2): 499-513.
[22]
谭中明, 康勤, 谭璇, 等. 基于新关联网络的金融机构关联度及其尾部风险溢出效应研究[J]. 金融发展研究, 2023(12): 49-60.
TAN Zhongming, KANG Qin, TAN Xuan, et al. A study of financial institutions’affiliations and their tail risk spillover effects based on new affiliated networks[J]. Journal of Financial Development Research, 2023(12): 49-60.
[23]
曹齐芳, 孔英. 基于复杂网络视角的金融科技风险传染研究[J]. 金融监管研究, 2021(2): 37-53.
CAO Qifang, KONG Ying. Financial technology risk trans-mission from the perspective of complex networks[J]. Financial Regulation Research, 2021(2): 37-53.
[24]
李绍芳, 刘晓星. 中国金融机构关联网络与系统性金融风险[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2018, 33(5): 34-48.
LI Shaofang, LIU Xiaoxing. The interconnected network and systemic risk of China’s financial institutions[J]. Financial Economics Research, 2018, 33(5): 34-48.
[25]
刘晓星, 任超, 李绍芳. 中国上市金融机构风险传染研究: 基于动态关联网络的视角[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2023(3): 39-49.
LIU Xiaoxing, REN Chao, LI Shaofang. The risk spillover effects of Chinese listed financial institutions-a study based on dynamic interconnected network[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2023(3): 39-49.
[26]
王纲金, 徐梓双, 谢赤. 中国金融机构关联性与系统性风险贡献研究: 基于尾部风险溢出网络视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2022, 25(5): 109-126.
WANG Gangjin, XU Zishuang, XIE Chi. Connectedness and systemic risk contribution of Chinese financial institutions: A perspective from tail risk spillover network[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2022, 25(5): 109-126.
[27]
李政, 李丽雯, 刘淇. 我国行业间尾部风险溢出的测度及时空驱动因素研究[J]. 统计研究, 2024, 41(2): 64-76.
LI Zheng, LI Liwen, LIU Qi. The measurement and spatial-temporal driving factors of China’s inter-industry tail risk spillovers[J]. Statistical Research, 2024, 41(2): 64-76.
[28]
石军, 庄新田, 庄霄威. 房地产市场系统性风险空间关联及溢出效应[J]. 系统工程, 2023, 41(3): 28-46.
SHI Jun, ZHUANG Xintian, ZHUANG Xiaowei. Analysis on the spatial correlation and spillover effects of systemic risks in real estate market[J]. Systems Engineering, 2023, 41(3): 28-46.
[29]
李政, 刘淇, 梁琪. 基于经济金融关联网络的中国系统性风险防范研究[J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(2): 23-37.
LI Zheng, LIU Qi, LIANG Qi. A study on forestalling China’s systemic risk based on financial industry and real economy interacted network[J]. Statistical Research, 2019, 36(2): 23-37.
[30]
ADRIAN T, BRUNNERMEIER M K. CoVaR[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(7): 1705-1741.
[31]
张嘉望, 李博阳, 杜强. 中国区域碳市场价格联动与风险溢出效应研究: 基于信息溢出视角[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2022(2): 148-160.
ZHANG Jiawang, LI Boyang, DU Qiang. Research on price linkage and risk spillover effect of China’s carbon market: Based on information spillover perspective[J]. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2022(2): 148-160.

Funding

Hebei Social Science Fund Project(HB23ZT008)
PDF(1843 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/